Re: MBF proposal: pidof used without Depends: procps

Chris Hofstaedtler <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Gioele Barabucci <[email protected]> [260507 00:45]:
>The aim of this MBF is to add procps to the dependencies of 94 package 
>that make use of `pidof` at runtime.

I agree in general, thanks to everyone working on this.

>---
>Subject: ${SOURCE} uses pidof but does not depend on procps
>
[..]
> Alternatively, you could remove all runtime uses of `pidof`.

That might be too strong a wording, as at least initramfs usecases 
have TTBOMK no other option?

Best,
Chris
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.