Re: Maintainer: Debian Commons

Hi

On 5/11/26 23:31, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> I'm linking this just to make sure that past technical arguments (first 
> and foremost, which email address to use) are acknowledged in this new 
> round of discussions.


People opposed using [email protected] as mail address which 
I completely agree with. My way of working is extremely low profile, it 
doesn't add any burden to anyone with respect to e-mails as the address 
that I'm using is already getting all the mail anyways. Any new mail 
list would require several actions. And as mentioned by some too, also I 
wouldn't subscribe to it.

>> DDPO shows all packages using Debian Commons together like here:
>> https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=viking%40packages.debian.org
> 
> What witchery is that?


I have no idea, I wasn't expecting it to work but just noticed it. There 
is extremely weird witchery involved though, because the other package 
that still use the old "be my guest" also show up there, awesome :). 
However, I just noticed that the witchery appears weird to me though, as 
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=cppi%40packages.debian.org 
doesn't get merged into it. So I'm inferring that it checks the 
uploaders field somehow. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted. I guess 
if/when this idea gets widespread the tools will be adapted by their 
owners or the commoners (via patches, MRs or straight fixes).

Paul

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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==
=xx1u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----