Re: Licensing of licenses
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Mechtilde Am 17.05.2026 16:50 schrieb Mechtilde Stehmann: > Am 17.05.26 um 15:33 schrieb [email protected]: >> So what? I have to force the DM to add a license info by itself >> somehow? > > Who do you have to force. Who do you mean with DM? > Who forces you to do so? I think there is a misunderstanding. No one forced me to something. :) > In my opinion it is a misunderstanding to require an explicit license > statement for the debian/copyright file. The important point is that the reuse-standard or the current implementation of their reuse-tool does require it. "spdx2debian" follow this standard (or implementation) does not want to add workarounds or exceptions to the behavior of "reuse-tool". Regards