Re: Concerning uniliateral decision making with respect to the coreutils package
Soren Stoutner <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jul 2026 08:20:18 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <2065175.usQuhbGJ8B@soren-desktop> |
On Sunday, July 12, 2026 6:05:25 AM Mountain Standard Time Ansgar 🙀 wrote: > People can start a fork where the additional contributions are licensed > under a copyleft license. Though I would recommend a GPLv2-compatible > license to not lock out a large part of the ecosystem and cause more > fragmentation. The GPLv3 practically pushes people to non-copyleft > licenses to avoid license problems in the future... What are the concerns with the GPLv3? The only concerns I have ever heard raised are by people who fundamentally disagree with the principles of the DFSG and don’t like that the GPLv3 enforces them. -- Soren Stoutner [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEJKVN2yNUZnlcqOI+wufLJ66wtgMFAmpVAjIACgkQwufLJ66w tgNk4Q//XeXJn+ifyzYNnmtyrQRoHVQVsaZlyM2p8dp6unNKkpY9XGPVlPvMbpgY MJfzMYKJ4zdSdDPUqmU/bN5cbFCTPB/kEXoU4OZFV9ktR3w8Qmxv/eStzoE+EdYX 9G5xZavr4+maB4STH+TR7L4tQx/0qkKqzrqduX52IesCdsrvkX0kXS5oxh4ug+KJ 51/EgMuTZcC4oS8uUGT93zJmXhFgTEc44Ms3uJEgWXUblDUIV0U3VM4fN3XPxCtN HfA5budXgMdwBP+VcAfFPjv+lNHMN3C7VTocsSYlA452UVwv9ELqH/PRNcYThE8N SwRhQmjCvv1f+T04chyoQk35fJTZS+6N3a8XH44dG4/EuXpYACsNpykZ8P6jS7EQ KL6T1P99/117Oc7yfjLiR4MFc96xCIbpNUvsoGSKqb+86JEQ50BrNcnXVDplBrrw 2m3iuyQkbizzJspuOlN5lMSwl0spWfeN4hcPcrGuHgcTV21aD+94nbb5d5nMvnvh HjyGhyRtZiddKr+b5Ug/FwzwQ3YFSUv56PvbUc4MQG8uWnTdGpgmJhzWjGV2pVq3 1oBRO/6w0fdMqgAi9qpzBmPxhdEQAJ0JLP2jSKdaMKiWsXefvLgif+4DsgDEhR/F a+aRv0r+zidWQP5b074HGaeakNcUenbwE2G+MG9J3Aw1q7b2soI= =d+pV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----