Re: epoch bump request for gnome-calculator
gregor herrmann <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 12:49:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > So is it appropriate to bump an epoch in Debian to match an important > > downstream's epoch? > Yes. Precisely because there is collaboration between both sides on those > packages. [..] I agree. While epochs are nasty and <yada-yada other all known disadvantages>, having this one more doesn't really hurt anyone and makes a maintainer's life easier. Therefore I'm willing to hold my nose, shrug, and look the other way :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Zueriwest: Zorro
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 963 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE0eExbpOnYKgQTYX6uzpoAYZJqgYFAlutQqtfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEQx RTEzMTZFOTNBNzYwQTgxMDREODVGQUJCM0E2ODAxODY0OUFBMDYACgkQuzpoAYZJ qgYnWxAApqy8wOlQkcwf3Qa4Y2pOghyKzn15A1L/eUBzrdwmApT3NOz+QgbTtNVT y104sF6F4MHCBBOyrEdreOxjhhgZP/8iNpJkky/6eQ8aYM4dOm8NCp7lGMR8TK9+ bfbIBJO8lc6HRHdxUa+k9mkjyqQwk/2tu4+H/OVK2pRmAKBtKVMcbY7k5KAT8MGh LVBtS3csG3noPiP6TxwMhQRuspsCrJj8mO1+/jdgAYYLkRtpDfrkNYTpHPtpPnX0 oToPvwLlvWt6vLdwC21SRGIe1vMHTLgsNEWNNcrAmQBD1aumBo/afiecHRt+i7y9 M+zRSu8QkxGdJN+leBQ29uEc+ej3AjJXOJEDYQdObGW2AqYe8Qvsm7rT7dWDrfHm 4fEq9Um6BTWaqqlck4GSTBI9wTNBwIP0eLJg816rvta6twK2LKcpoF5Q/YuaxSRk 9pxcpAClGmeJYcG9vkHG8U7L3V8NaWoNPu1wmn17SgfOsC2gJ4rtvgDgoGU+7YsL CkJBCydG20/M5Hm+NgHWTmRqWYokr+j/c4moK906v8KQhVuhHqAe/Mn1jzF/K4FO /EqqLfksD1+ZsotvVDeL8TQI4JcEp0mrYPjCVM6zNc9JchAxufa2TI0Nbz8hlBvD WDwtfIAJZ2qXg5a0z67Cz4XBIAdONkwQzXtDAG3rbWT5LEdvMAY= =3Ori -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----