Re: epoch bump request for gnome-calculator
Holger Levsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.gtk-gnome |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:50:51PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Yes. Precisely because there is collaboration between both sides on those
> > packages.
> [..]
>
> I agree.
>
> While epochs are nasty and <yada-yada other all known disadvantages>,
> having this one more doesn't really hurt anyone and makes a
> maintainer's life easier. Therefore I'm willing to hold my nose,
> shrug, and look the other way :)
Yup, I agree.
--
cheers,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAluuEEcACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhydGA//bIEXhbAffsG1xRbc999LEdg2OC+KUjj5D7u8ydi4+M2NdtKWce+byNMu qrdKYzirscXLuAh23yaCyRDGAOxE4PU8Twf6PzOhcf3LVPnzK+wM7qn391pgEWPK 6ZMqmfxKGqvYi3i9DMuQtHHIn2HxQwqnsVbQfT/wVLlTVUt2DAvEEt0wp66S6pXu NWYEknwtxLx4H0F7ORvV/Q5HnxfSePR6qALr9khheOFbZhaqJC/3eu1anUvgNRcG Rx/KhKNK8iZXF2xJFXK9U0OBCllGGwNUqb9YCw1RFBzn+OXgRhKnBkWR776Z8lTs VcNKndqA7xJgIZbQLmpUxDoJTdjh6Ck4KiR0xbT5mrKw2OmU/w0DrDizTt2ZYUL2 6/MblmFq6bHFZxj8dQFq+W+6yvEgZsKagDb3UENrJhKioTq/CuPV1xjgzlq8eN3y mmc97zfRN50dYv6bT+Ll6kLaz/UxrhkKiAUjaBVc2EyLn7VfJQO/rdwXpeNPhUor C8rnKdOvJndxNXf7YzFAWmyV9d57ok2iQtoF7ispGpcMYOQD3b3idBMTHqllQEOv bzxiEXKiPfHVhBgDudi+mi6v1lHvUNw1O8uvS3noaA5kpbqUP0cnEiogLBxOVwXV XujTF85eg2yc0MhY4vr/NFKxdplAU9nucv+XOtboP2fdSbCt5xU= =4Xml -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----