Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses
Francesco Poli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 23:17:04 +0200 Serafeim Zanikolas wrote: [...] > my inclination is > to KISS and assume that all "License: MPL-2" is without the copyleft > restriction If I correctly understand the design philosophy, risking a false negative is better than risking a false positive. So I can agree that, when in doubt, adequate should assume there's no license incompatibility to report... -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEygERR5zS79/7gjklPhwn4R9pv/4FAmaJwv4ACgkQPhwn4R9p v/6VMxAAtbLGmy6T+5gwELHof3ALgNYKyzSKIQ82BhrdShCAoKVZUIBfWOimVv3I DBVACNMci/OGnxX5bqQT5hxHLr1w8Ph9uYnZEamqsINNDRPtVjxmQH+x3+Mnp1dr OwEEwfBjmvlB15mdZ5PkauyxKBLjYM24eN7seISXfNzqYuOKF+iVwC5iFX5BI0bR wsnlNtScLoyNb7089SCYyP4GZnIbzCqxLQDjTgo5DVSA87amdJ3v3HCX+qfs9UFx pOrX0nk7gJ222oTGlQKoZ1EMmOJXoIm2tFbixM94k6wP9gHqEDo6Gp/ea0HV5Hmh zZoN4GQhwuDhGjs/ngeFpSWCS5u5M+YqRm15pH12wF/Yn4/jZosItiDzZ7oIbk46 gGNG4KlAmlro0IIVVPygxU7d/KUvLKtwu+U5fkHtGRLOzIuwpg6ej9omZ22XaRjH KU6a8iRPaJjHpA7twuunq6Y7dpdiks8WuCzUtr02KMzOGemOuDRrst7qnwZLtmtC rR7z3mcMnR6D/6cTNijK82Ri4W06NX5ST1dTbuPGeuf/zKK1sHL8jTbecTIJWgT4 9i9Ro4REKicTEFHxuFaLBlIjnV/+FjvoejTojbRIHgzG1+9S2eeT3XnuGqNfaelw AGkev2biWHP8GwN8PSXPjWnaVUSKOZDW8e2seLt06CACm+DWln0= =VTCE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----