Re: compatibility matrix for /usr/share/common-licenses

"Serafeim Zanikolas" <[email protected]> Sun, 07 Jul 2024 15:50:59 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Francesco, thanks for the patch! applied and pushed (and additionally added you
as an author)

Nicholas, Francesco, you're now both set as reviewers. can I ask you to both let
me know whether you're happy for me to change the review status to completed?

sidenote: I'm toying with the idea of proposing certain markdown conventions to
improve discoverability/visibility of team-local and cross-team proposals, in a
way that's less scary/formal than DEPs, and compatible with email. I'l do a
write up about it at some point; please do let me know if you'd like to be an
early reviewer

On Sun Jul 7, 2024 at 12:19 AM CEST, Francesco Poli wrote:
> If I correctly understand the design philosophy, risking a false
> negative is better than risking a false positive.
> So I can agree that, when in doubt, adequate should assume there's no
> license incompatibility to report...

that's right.

thanks again!

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)