Re: Status of the t64 transition

Andreas Tille <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical,gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.linux.debian.devel.release,gmane.linux.debian.ports.arm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Sebastian,

thank you for your work on t64 transition.

Am Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:22:02PM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:

I've spotted these Debian Med packages.

> gentle
> jellyfish
> quorum
> sbmltoolbox

No idea how we can help here.  Please let us know if we can do
something.

> anfo

We like to fix gcc-12 issues (#1012893) in anfo but so far nobody
managed to do so since it seems to be quite complex.  If we are
blocking progress with this package its probably a sign that it
should be removed from Debian.

> blasr

We try to work on #1067374.

> freebayes

Upstream is working on bug #1067271.

> vg

This package is in a bad state in any case and we are aware of this.
However, could you explain in how far is this affecting t64 transition
since 32bit architectures are excluded?

> If you maintain any of the packages above, please check their status and
> help get them fixed. Any help in filing bugs, fixing packages,
> requesting removals, etc. is appreciated so that we can look into
> unblocking the whole stack and migrate it to testing.

I fixed two packages of Debian Python Team and pinged about some
packages in Debian Science Team.

Kind regards
    Andreas.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.