Re: Status of the t64 transition

Hi Sebastian,

Andreas Tille, on 2024-04-19:
> I've spotted these Debian Med packages.
[…]
> Am Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:22:02PM +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
[…]
> > jellyfish
> > quorum
[…]
> No idea how we can help here.  Please let us know if we can do
> something.

About these two packages, I'm not 100% sure, but I believe some
confusion may stem from jellyfish's support removal for 32-bit
architectures[1,2].  This made the transition unnecessary so the
package renaming has been undone in version 2.3.1-3, as far as I
can witness in the changelog.  This probably affected quorum
transitively; and also this possibly affected crac, the other
libjellyfish-2.0-2 reverse dependency, although I don't know why
it hasn't stood out on the list.

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/1067166
[2]: https://github.com/gmarcais/Jellyfish/pull/202#issuecomment-2007544485

In hope this clarifies things,
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity
   `-

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=PCQN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----