Re: Migration to htslib ecosystem 1.20.

Étienne Mollier <[email protected]> Thu, 30 May 2024 21:06:11 +0200

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Étienne Mollier, on 2024-05-30:
> Some of the htslib packages were already available in their 1.20
> version counterpart, so I tried to finish the migration
> yesterday as I had some time.  I seem to have fumbled a bit the
> samtools upload by forgetting to declare it requires libhts-dev
> 1.20 specifically, as otherwise tests are not passing.  Giveback
> attempts are still capturing htslib 1.19, so I prepared a
> samtols upload with bumped build dependency version.  In the
> meantime, there may be stray uninstallable samtools-test
> packages in sid, as the arch-all package build went through, but
> not the arch-anys.  Otherwise not too much to worry about.
> 
> If everything goes according to the plan, the htslib 1.20
> ecosystem should be consistent in testing in a couple of days.

Erm, things didn't go according to the plan.  Thankfully Salsa
caught properly my failure to handle properly arch-any &
no-arch-all builds (which went hidden behind the version
discrepancy issue).  Anyway this should be fixed in samtools
1.20-3 upload (I failed to dcut rm 1.20-2 in time).  Hopefully
it is good for real now.

That's some entropy thrown at the archive in little time.
Perhaps I should favor resting now and see how things evolved
tomorrow.

Have a good night,
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity
   `-    on air: England - The Imperial Hotel

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)