Re: Migration to htslib ecosystem 1.20.

Hi,

thank you for all your work
    Andreas.

Am Thu, May 30, 2024 at 09:06:11PM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> Étienne Mollier, on 2024-05-30:
> > Some of the htslib packages were already available in their 1.20
> > version counterpart, so I tried to finish the migration
> > yesterday as I had some time.  I seem to have fumbled a bit the
> > samtools upload by forgetting to declare it requires libhts-dev
> > 1.20 specifically, as otherwise tests are not passing.  Giveback
> > attempts are still capturing htslib 1.19, so I prepared a
> > samtols upload with bumped build dependency version.  In the
> > meantime, there may be stray uninstallable samtools-test
> > packages in sid, as the arch-all package build went through, but
> > not the arch-anys.  Otherwise not too much to worry about.
> > 
> > If everything goes according to the plan, the htslib 1.20
> > ecosystem should be consistent in testing in a couple of days.
> 
> Erm, things didn't go according to the plan.  Thankfully Salsa
> caught properly my failure to handle properly arch-any &
> no-arch-all builds (which went hidden behind the version
> discrepancy issue).  Anyway this should be fixed in samtools
> 1.20-3 upload (I failed to dcut rm 1.20-2 in time).  Hopefully
> it is good for real now.
> 
> That's some entropy thrown at the archive in little time.
> Perhaps I should favor resting now and see how things evolved
> tomorrow.
> 
> Have a good night,
> -- 
>   .''`.  Étienne Mollier <[email protected]>
>  : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
>  `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity
>    `-    on air: England - The Imperial Hotel