Aw: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages

Steffen Möller <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Jul 2025 15:14:17 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical
Message-ID <trinity-5c6318db-01e0-467a-926c-fe4017c74bee-1753110856967@trinity-msg-rest-gmx-gmx-live-85885f45cf-6g9t2>
Hi Charles,


> Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2025 um 14:59
> Von: "Charles Plessy" <[email protected]>
> An: "Steffen Möller" <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages
>
> Le Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 12:50:06PM +0000, Steffen Möller a écrit :
> > 
> > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ihm
> > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-modelcif
> > 
> > In my humble opinion those packages are reasonably fine to upload - maybe after the release, but technically fine. I would appreciate a peer review in case I have messed something up. And please feel free sponsoring the package if sufficiently happy.
> 

> please allow me to advertise https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team !

First time I ever heard about it. Looks interesting, will do!

> Also, I wonder if these packages would be more suitable for the python team, if
> their maintainance benefits more from Python knowledge than bioinformatics
> knowledge?

I was tempted to upload to Debian Science, but the Python team I recall to have outsourced the maintenance of several sciency-Python packages before. The driving motivation for me to address their packaging is the aforeITPed boltz software (an alphafold-substitute), so I think it is fine. We can still move it another day once that more reverse dependencies are surfacing in Debian.

Best,
Steffen