Aw: Aw: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages

Hey all,

https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team/reviews/-/issues/11

harbors the request to check what I have come up with for the ihm Python module.

Many thanks,
Steffen

 



> Gesendet: Montag, 21. Juli 2025 um 17:14
> Von: "Steffen Möller" <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> Betreff: Aw: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages
>
> 
> Hi Charles,
> 
> 
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juli 2025 um 14:59
> > Von: "Charles Plessy" <[email protected]>
> > An: "Steffen Möller" <[email protected]>
> > CC: [email protected]
> > Betreff: Re: Requesting review(+ optional upload) of new python-ihm and python-modelcif packages
> >
> > Le Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 12:50:06PM +0000, Steffen Möller a écrit :
> > > 
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-ihm
> > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/python-modelcif
> > > 
> > > In my humble opinion those packages are reasonably fine to upload - maybe after the release, but technically fine. I would appreciate a peer review in case I have messed something up. And please feel free sponsoring the package if sufficiently happy.
> > 
> 
> > please allow me to advertise https://salsa.debian.org/newgateway-team !
> 
> First time I ever heard about it. Looks interesting, will do!
> 
> > Also, I wonder if these packages would be more suitable for the python team, if
> > their maintainance benefits more from Python knowledge than bioinformatics
> > knowledge?
> 
> I was tempted to upload to Debian Science, but the Python team I recall to have outsourced the maintenance of several sciency-Python packages before. The driving motivation for me to address their packaging is the aforeITPed boltz software (an alphafold-substitute), so I think it is fine. We can still move it another day once that more reverse dependencies are surfacing in Debian.
> 
> Best,
> Steffen
> 
>