Re: Aw: Re: r-bioc-oligo(classes) - updated on salsa, not sent to main - but what sid offers is not installable?!
Charles Plessy <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:02:41 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.medical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Steffen, I hope that you do not mind I answer in public. My emails are rejected by gmx.de... Le Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 08:33:18AM +0000, Steffen Möller a écrit : > > We typically install the latest version of a package available, so anything > meant as part of 3.24 we ship nonetheless, right? Yes, we ship the latest release (3.23). > On https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.21/bioc/html/zlibbioc.html I found that > there is an update to it. I suggest I update to that latest version that would > then ship with Debian and we remove it from the archive for forky+1? If nothing depends anymore on zlibbioc after the transition I think that we can remove it as soon as possible. Today I have also uploaded the HDF5-related packages after heavy changes of the unvendoring paches, under the supervision of Claude 4.8 (not the contrary unfortunately; unvendoring libraries is not my expertise). The autopkgtests of r-bioc-rhdf5 passed, but if you or others have experience, I would appreciate if you could have a quick check if the 8$ of tokens were well spent. Have a nice day, Charles