Re: Request for review - A number of packages
Andrew Ruthven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 15:52 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 03 Jul 2023 11:49:40 +1200, Andrew Ruthven wrote: > > And: libtest-snapshot-perl uploaded. Thank you. [libbadger-perl] > > > > > > > > > Given the shipped tests pass, is it acceptable to filter these out > > > > of autopkgtests? > > > If we have a reason to believe that the "-c" failures are harmless > > > then yes; that would require getting a deeper understanding of this > > > whole project that I currently have :) > > I *think* that the modules aren't intended to be used standalone, so > > could be skipped. > > Alright, in that case adding the 2 filenames to > debian/tests/pkg-perl/syntax-skip should do the trick. Except that this file appears to apply to runtime-deps-and- recommends.d/syntax.t . The tests which are failing are in runtime- deps.d/use.t . Using debian/tests/pkg-perl/use-whitelist isn't sufficient, and while I could list each module in debian/tests/pkg-perl/use-name that seems a bit brittle. Perhaps a skiplist should be supported here as well? (And it seems that d/tests/pkg-perl/syntax-skip doesn't support comments, whereas the files for use.t do support comments.) Would you be open to a merge request here? [libgraphviz2-perl] > > > Thanks, uploaded as well. Thank you. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Ruthven, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] | Catalyst Cloud: | This space intentionally left blank https://catalystcloud.nz |