Re: Bug#1052161: ITP: libmozilla-ca-perl -- Mozilla's CA cert bundle in PEM format
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.perl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:45:41AM +0200, Andreas Vögele wrote: >Gregor Hermann writes: > >On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:48:33 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: >>>>[...] Maybe a wrapper could be tought for packages that have some optional dep on that? [...] >>Given that we've had to patch only 3 packages (in pkg-perl) over the >>last decades and that the patch is trivial, and given that a >>Mozilla::CA package doing different things on Debian than upstream >>would cause confusion, I recommend against going that way. >> >>Let's see what others on the list say. > >For example, the Mozilla::CA requirement can be removed from >Alien::Build::Plugin::Fetch::HTTPTiny in libalien-build-perl and be >replaced by a dependency on ca-certificates. > >https://github.com/PerlAlien/Alien-Build/blob/cfdc0e74364c05d62c50ed77345b480c93eb90ce/lib/Alien/Build/Plugin/Fetch/HTTPTiny.pm#L62 > >HTTP::Tiny uses the system's certificates if Mozilla::CA is not available. > >https://github.com/chansen/p5-http-tiny/blob/2f17ba0a6c979b8c37feef830861eeb633484358/lib/HTTP/Tiny.pm#L1640 > >I've been using a personal libalien-build-perl package without >Mozilla::CA for a long time. > Mmmmhhh, it's me or the idea of potentially patching 79 rev-deps on Mozilla::CA seems not a great idea? https://metacpan.org/module/Mozilla::CA/requires?p=1&size=100 Of course, probably some rdeps could be adaptive and skip Mozilla::CA when not available, but anyway...