Bug#1135097: Please extent list of licenses named in chapter 12.5
Holger Levsen <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:12:37 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <afCIFWyIVkd726os__40559.6268874191$1777371329$gmane$org@layer-acht.org> |
On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 10:09:31AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > There is a systematic way we handle this: it has to be shown that the > license text is so common that deduplicating it in this way will save > disk space on the vast majority of Debian systems. I doubt that all > those licenses meet that criterion. i'm surprised that diskspace (in base-files) is even a factor here, we're talking about kilobytes or maybe a few megabytes. i'd value maintainer time & ease much higher than a few hundred or thousand kilobyes of diskspace. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ The system isn't broken. It was built this way.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEuL9UE3sJ01zwJv6dCRq4VgaaqhwFAmnwiBUACgkQCRq4Vgaa qhwBPg/9FfygSbXaxsoQFwuZtxgY4kgkH7i4chu3kVZJkRlEddkzSzy+IkL6M6v4 52r/OMz84XZcbZLaQnSSbNT65s4pNBfVGcUN6bStWEBMmXsi4BS3uK1e6R2MrXOP WFjFUQ2gD+H4ZRx8rM7pFf1OmtHQL1rkbbOer38ZC4rypw/IZZ9022LaPMBkWzed hVXNYZ5ZukGP5VD3/So+UsdR1tmpdV052EiEwFpG5k9EhkZbLSEBQi7EKCPrndIm k0gOgRyiqeeoJ+BODaPQXy9R8txTlCrW4yaxROJzV8S0AnDXQf5OaJplacUIcfhY lcsACuZaFh9GhvIllqUfNeQNeqHSUEOYlBJmtBm7ie5FJi6zyOlAGT4alhvGTTye EhOLmaumzIw8EMMVLAvhY+wUsrQlKuIS5VLiWbAbmB5niYRFO0njoMRz8D+8yKtG CgMIWRQtkQsvwEtc6UBsR3bDBGdiBVD8OzUhX7uKwDDMTREMlkA7fAOW+b5tJo7M 15fG2XpHIZ8G9uV1XGyT0NnifTD3cfYAp27f30+HXXYYPFLI3xA0C7lmT1HOiuSH Z4OptyxRevdMAosEEgVovyV3+KHKWfshg1JVlB/xevYUopdHD4g5qmcNTk2izppH D7hJ9M3wZnkszvppweaWdXxcR8qP2c1pdz0sY3+Gnlm7bJ8inkw= =zjlT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----