Bug#1135097: Bug#885698: What licenses should be included in /usr/share/common-licenses?
Sean Whitton <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Apr 2026 11:26:18 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.policy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <87cxzj754l.fsf__30126.3235671044$1777372171$gmane$org@zephyr.silentflame.com> |
Holger Levsen [28/Apr 10:08am GMT] wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 10:20:16AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: >> I think that the "at least 100 packages" part of this proposal is too >> low a bar. > > why do you think so? I think 100 is quite a high bar already. > (assuming we talk source packages.) Those 100 could easily be packages that most systems don't have installed -- or, in particular, that systems that are trying to be really small almost never have installed. Really we need to hear from the people who are trying to make the minimal install of Debian small. That's not me. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 869 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJNBAEBCgA3FiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmnwi0oZHHNwd2hpdHRv bkBzcHdoaXR0b24ubmFtZQAKCRBpW3rkvwZiQDyMD/9bW8iyCcEI88iux2zX0cT3 QMM3yG+dfFGSBeEoIx0IObi2vLimCFlnoj97kASLvGpJeg8dReJrslIdEszg0z+b KppqJjpa71s/GPQSkMpQpunSCaPMpVLS4mfBgaG4q+euqG/0Kb5jVBajqIeNDyyB b7JGPeY/b/AA4bmEbiOmkU0D7C8o1q8doDyokAWq+9gjOiYX2CMP4UU9jhVUtSdX 18TVsidPKwgZiGlLA8j+5tV4e/hn/3KCvTv8RN8pM47T9D1lLJ+dZfe1Q5MHBb+1 lGouvPsZ/+XSXQv5A1rBAylltBiZIiVvdcgquC5vL2lZvDNzYRtHh982ScDP+Xdw Ziy6hzQfhaFxisHOnpmSUUZ6oMbxF+lGfuZtT7TydeuIAiDPcVYzC6KmjcD8uzo+ Nmke2kozFUcPKT9YrJLlWMNLvvktMR71sRvgphhKoRzGA75oQVYM9qx9XLFLv6eN M11EAD7IiaPXTRvViZS8u92dj4QBX3rmQG5FkeFPgxgDHtn2pRV00GjkOLjI5WSa NC3Cmflu15ZTf83lzMKcnIlLohReHaQDbU0lnmqUgaZcE8Jqo+2w123yL/C+eBwX 9sW1XKu45Ha/68SzwJ2s21DEmEtIsIh5ko0M1dQVm9yf0ylfCc6+K54AoM/JGkLu iKQkZxtNP61ZvTP9E5FwiA== =0FJo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----