Re: Publicity team meeting: January 2025, time vote, Agenda

Hi!

Happy new year / നവവല്സര ആശംസകല്
  / Bonne année /  नये साल की हार्दिक शुभकामनायें / gelukkig nieuwjaar!


On Sat, Jan 04, 2025 at 01:36:35AM +0100, Jean-Pierre Giraud wrote:
> Hi all, and happy new year !Le vendredi 03 janvier 2025 à 18:09 -0500,
> Donald Norwood - Debian Press and Publicity a écrit :
> > Hello Everyone,
> > 
> >         It is time for the next Publicity Team monthly meeting. This
> > gathering will be
> > an at length meeting so that we can clear all agenda items. This
> > meeting should
> > allow our team to close agenda items rather than leaving them for the
> > next meeting.
> > 
> >         Please vote/indicate which dates would work best over your
> > schedule for your
> > attendance: https://rally.debian.net/invite/0Y2IqFC5N42P
> > 
> 
> I would like the meeting to start an hour earlier for better timezone
> coverage (17:00 UTC)

Yes, starting at 17:00 UTC i.e. 18:00 CET could work for me.

> and extend the survey to Tuesday January 7th as
> planned at the December meeting


> I point out that the next point release of Debian will take place
> on January 11th and we have to prepare it in the days before.

Jean-Pierre: I hope to be able to contribute some tiny bit of work like e.g.
proofreading this time.  Are you available again to do the bulk of the work?

> Finally, I think that limiting the meeting to an hour and a half maximum
> is more reasonable.

Yes please.  I am very busy with Real Life™ these days; I might be able to
allocate an hour (or even an hour and a half) but more just won't happen.


> > Rally can be finicky, if you have an issue logging in or using it switch to
> > a private browser session. If it works perfectly or does not let us know,
> > we can only make it better with some feedback.
> > 
> >         The agenda is open for edit:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/publicity-team/todo/-/blob/main/Meetings/January2025Meeting.md
> > 
> > We will dedicate 5-10 minutes per item, this should help us speed through
> > the meeting a bit faster. That timing approach worked for a similar
> > lengthened meeting that we had last year, lets see if it still works for
> > us.

We could try that indeed.  But if we can't reach rough consensus within that
small slot of time; we should be prepared to keep the item on the agenda for
next meeting, I'd guess.

Donald: thanks for organising this!

Bye,

Joost