Re: DPL candidate interviews

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 09:59:09AM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 02:30:15PM +0530, disaster2life wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:42:54AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 02:47:55PM +0100, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
> > > > Given the short time frame, and given the fact we don't have 2 but 4
> > > > candidates for this term, and as discussed, we plan to do text based
> > > > interviews this round. To keep a real time / live feeling, I suggest
> > > > using IRC (bridged to matrix).  Next to the interview channel, we could
> > > > have a dedicated channel for chatter among the audience; with some time
> > > > for 'questions from audience members'.  How do people feel about that?
> 
> > > I like the idea. How was performed the interviews in the past? Sent the
> > > questions via email  can be an option? But in that way we will loose the
> > > chance to re-ask (quickly). 
> 
> > As far as I am aware regarding how interviews were conducted previously,
> > last year they were done over jitsi, and before that they had been
> > conducted over irc and or email in a correspondence fashion.
> 

> > > > As for time schedule: we just started the 3 week campaigning period,
> > > > and voting starts at sun april 6: about 3 weeks from now.
> > > > 
> > > > As I see it, tasks now are:
> 
> > > > - register 2 dedicated irc channels w/ matrix bridges
> 
> I can do that (note to self: ask if it's ok to use #debian-dpl , register
> #debian-dpl-interview , ask for matrix bridge).
> 
<snip>

> > > > - think about subjects / questions (refer to platforms and discussion
> > > > on [email protected])

^ this one is still open. suggestions welcome :)

Bye,

Joost