Re: Cleaning out Lintian's "Experimental: yes" tags
Andrey Rakhmatullin <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jan 2026 00:51:19 +0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.quality-assurance |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 02:30:00PM -0500, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
>>>* update-debian-copyright
>>> - last updated: 2022-12
>>> - 22,597 entries in UDD
>>> - This tag was highly controversial when it was implemented and I don't see its usefulness.
>>
>>:) I'd move it to pedantic.
>
>It's already pedantic ("Experimental: yes" is another thing
>altogether). I would strongly oppose to moving this back to
>"Experimental: no" as many, many people (including me) complained
>about this tag.
>
>AFAIU, your copyright notice doesn't need to be updated yearly to stay
>valid, even if you add new changes. As such, I don't think Lintian
>should promote busy work.
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2023/01/08/copyright-without-years/
(no idea what's the ftp-master stance on this)
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 894 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJhBAABCgBLFiEEtf6ieDcfC1EgtGkao+OWn23e7IYFAmlcFjEtFIAAAAAAFQAP cGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3Jnd3JhckBkZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJEKPjlp9t3uyG pAgP/3+127HyCCjal3lF/mnLAWeNopRmYtkUOJDPjy3qwcZEuSAaFi8F1a8soyKO 1CCsEW5vFZ1a6AjA8SCYmV5zHeQTVzjIdWxkzQEcoFJUXJHxxIKt4i/9NF0SxBiS F1wB9TJFvW842A9e3yd2joLxRxghvlo2cGdYK9876y2RlOzpYTQ7r17f19j3ey/B dfUQRpJgOW5EsY7zTXbj2uhKRwlqzmCgBpmbitVbJ2DUumclcYjKWBhVEvo6Wk02 TSwxRPYKjoMgwjG+mPG/IBQzIb+cPEobPmT3qT2k9JNUzL1fcQbyJIVBsPfXcpUx 7SizIoLyWjiP0eVF1+hjKmOrRyUvbwkgokPhpN72fcjjrZTJQJ1xhapMHRzIHacQ KcCwchWsr4USiwv941mnu8Pmcyq5yJt3umklM+BeFKHaJQWiywJw+CswP6fwvquP TuM5Lbp1NAPrkLIIAFXg+Z2hAd8ii7612adQ2xrc4ljNdn8Ekfc0dZdgGRKfd4e6 c3Zqc4iYBy9UotoawwGL7KjzJRPki5qrky+Y0mfAc+BJT9f8HQz/3+HjmY/QLqLp 13INoBfoXD02IEbc+G/HATCTfzmkiRn3BhuOwWztmydjfku2+BBtQSfKazd3g72l qeBWk05MlJptGQJsVBkrQBfcgnh/drjzf5xeLATNa5AYH5aJ =NXDT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----