Bug#1139451: trixie-pu: package llvm-toolchain-22/1:22.1.7-1~deb13u1

On Tue, Aug 4, 2026, at 11:44 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/07/2026 10:38, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026, at 7:25 PM, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026, at 6:35 PM, Andres Salomon wrote:
>>>> On 7/24/26 11:39, Fabian Gr=C3=BCnbichler wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2026, at 7:04 PM, Andres Salomon wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/6/26 14:37, Andres Salomon wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Okay, that took a little longer than expected because building ch=
romium
>>>>>> on trixie with llvm-toolchain-22 broke (related to trixie's older
>>>>>> bindgen), but we have a workaround for chromium and I was able to=
 test
>>>>>> chromium builds with this new ~deb13u2 package.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've attached the full debdiff between sid's version and this bac=
kport,
>>>>>> but the only non-changelog difference between ~deb13u1 and ~deb13=
u2 is
>>>>>> the bit at the end:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> it would probably be good if we could wait for this MR to land:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/-/merge_requ=
ests/224
>>>>>
>>>>> to avoid the need for another bump for rustc(-web)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah jeez - if that were a smaller commit, I'd just cherry-pick it and
>>>> roll a ~deb13u3. Given the size though, I'll wait for the llvm pack=
ages
>>>> to pick it up and migrate to forky.
>>>
>>> FWIW, the actual change is the first small hunk, the rest is testsui=
te
>>> changes that I don't think the Debian build even runs. Let me
>>> double-check and verify (and minimize accordingly).
>>=20
>> updated MR (original one got merged already) opened, since what I wro=
te
>> above holds.
>>=20
>>>> Mike & Emilio, are you good with another 2-4 week delay for the llvm
>>>> backoprt?
>>>>
>>>> Also in the meantime, I'd appreciate testing of the current package=
s:
>>>>
>>>> https://people.debian.org/~dilinger/llvm22/
>>>>
>>>> You can grab the orig from sid/forky if you want to rebuild, I'm on=
 a
>>>> train right now and don't have very good wifi. I've only tested it
>>>> building chromium, so builds of firefox or rustc would help shake o=
ut
>>>> any additional changes we might need to make.
>>>
>>> I can give them a spin to build a dlstage0 backport of rustc 1.96 fr=
om
>>> experimental (the earlier versions are still on LLVM 21) over the
>>> weekend.
>>=20
>> rustc 1.96.1 from experimental (with a slight adaptation to match
>> trixie's libgit2, and the `pkg.rustc.dlstage0` (no 1.95 in trixie yet)
>> and `nowasm` (lack of wasm-tools) build profiles works as expected wi=
th
>> your current test packages.
>
> Do you have test packages or a .dsc somewhere?

put a test build of rustc 1.96.0 with nowasm,pkg.rustc.dlstage0 and Andr=
es'
LLVM 22 packages here:

https://people.debian.org/~fabiang/rustc-trixie-llvm-22/