Re: Proposal A Amendament (was: Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models
Sam Hartman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Gunnar" == Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> writes: Gunnar> M. Zhou dijo [Mon, May 05, 2025 at 03:41:14PM -0400]: >> The issue is also discussed here: >> https://lwn.net/Articles/1019028/ >> >> A better wording goes: s/open source license/DFSG-compatible >> license/g >> >> It is fixed in the git repo: >> https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg/-/commit/9496f9fb6405db5a99fff1672cd4bad66c925c24 >> >> The proposal after amendament: >> >> =============================================================================== >> Proposal A: "AI models released under DFSG-compatible license >> license without original training data or program" are not seen >> as DFSG-compliant. >> =============================================================================== >> >> The "AI models released under DFSG-compatible license license >> without original training data or program", a particular type of >> files as explained above, are not seen as DFSG-compliant. Hence, >> they can not be included in the "main" section of the Debian >> archive. This proposal does not specify whether the "non-free" >> section of Debian archive can include those files. The amended wording addresses the issue I raised; thanks.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 227 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQSj2jRwbAdKzGY/4uAsbEw8qDeGdAUCaBkcVwAKCRAsbEw8qDeG dLWtAQC6yeJGH1LiwObkZ772/P4BV7+OTmsQ7E+XtqbhCawAqwEA5bZnHenBhhx9 HwQ12A8hdzL29a5+auerNyZn9A8u3gI= =hBSL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----