Re: Proposal A Amendament (was: Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models

M. Zhou dijo [Mon, May 05, 2025 at 03:41:14PM -0400]:
>The issue is also discussed here:
>https://lwn.net/Articles/1019028/
>
>A better wording goes:
>s/open source license/DFSG-compatible license/g
>
>It is fixed in the git repo:
>https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/gr-ai-dfsg/-/commit/9496f9fb6405db5a99fff1672cd4bad66c925c24
>
>The proposal after amendament:
>
>===============================================================================
>Proposal A: "AI models released under DFSG-compatible license license without
>            original training data or program" are not seen as DFSG-compliant.
>===============================================================================
>
>The "AI models released under DFSG-compatible license license without original
>training data or program", a particular type of files as explained above, are
>not seen as DFSG-compliant. Hence, they can not be included in the "main"
>section of the Debian archive. This proposal does not specify whether the
>"non-free" section of Debian archive can include those files.

Thank you very much. In case it is in doubt, I sponsored the original
wording, and I confirm I'm sponsoring the amended version.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wr0EABYKAG8FgmgZFooJEOL2O0NT9FmJRxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25z
LnNlcXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ0dsgZP52gm/e23FXLHX94EQIu8LxSyjJxMgrA+fY2V2
FiEEYLMJPZYQjly5cULv4vY7Q1P0WYkAAGyMAQDJQJr1wlQKYf0hhRXsiIcErZdp
BDwcrtEVHWChEGAAVQEApxx1myi/LCYK7Hxc6Tqa7t/fQKDI00bolhsNj1RrNQY=
=7O2+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----