Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data

On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 02:56, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> I think if any of the options in the current GR except Aigars's (and maybe
> Sam's?) passes, that would effectively be a change in our current policy,
> even if the current policy is not precisely intentional.


IMHO my option will also be a change in our current policy, but, instead of
requiring the training data itself, my option would just require adding a
documentation section describing how to create/gather and process data
required to train such models *if* someone would want to reproduce them.

I expect that any policy change would need a transition period to be
practical.

-- 
Best regards,
    Aigars Mahinovs