Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data

On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 02:56, Russ Allbery <[email protected]> wrote:

> That means I'm not sure how to vote on the current proposal as it
> currently stands. I'd rather not have to do a second GR just to clarify
> the timing of implementation given the upcoming release. Maybe there's
> still time to address that directly? Also, there is absolutely nothing
> wrong with temporarily withdrawing a GR (or even having it fail because we
> didn't realize in previous debian-project discussions that we'd not fully
> worked through the idea yet), and then bringing it back up when we have an
> implementation plan.
>
>
IMHO this whole discussion is *ideally* suited for an in-person exchange of
ideas at the upcoming Debconf in France :D

There we could have first a high level panel session on what the different
ideological positions on this question are, what is the basic thinking
there and thus what are the clusters of options for Debian to take. And
following on that we could have a technical session where a specific GR
covering those options could be worded out and the implementation
consequences of each detailed.

There is no specific reason for Debian to rush into having a specific
position on this, is there?
-- 
Best regards,
    Aigars Mahinovs