Re: Non-LLM example where we do not in practice use original training data

On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 06:10:37PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>That is not my preference nor what I would want to see happen, but I
>think it is consistent with how Debian approach including non-free
>firmware in the official installer images, and how Debian approaches
>licensing on other non-source files inside packages.

So what is your preference and what would you want to see happen?
I ask because I see no good options here.  I am thinking about
this from the perspective of a user who wants to use the models
unmodified and from the perspective of a user who wants to
modify the models to work better with a face that the models
"consider" an outlier.