Re: Q: DPL helpers
Sruthi Chandran <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 19/03/26 14:50, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Sruthi, > > >From your platform: > >> 1. Administrative >> >> DPL helpers (DPL committee? DPL administrative assistance team?) >> >> I have heard from the previous DPLs that the workload is too huge to >> be completed by a single person. During my last round of contesting, >> someone suggested the concept of having helpers for DPL. I agree with >> the thought process and I intend to have 1-2 people to do some work >> that can be offloaded from the DPL workload. This would help in >> reducing revert time and increasing efficiency. > How would this work in practice? Specifically: > > In practice, the delegation mechanism makes it hard to delegate DPL > powers without being quite specific about what is being delegated in > terms of areas of responsibility and decision-making. Do you plan to use > delegations for that offloading? I do not intend to offload decision-making and DPL powers. > > I might be wrong, but I think that the only way offloading has worked in > the past is by offloading specific tasks that don't involve the transfer > of DPL powers, such as: > - producing drafts, proof-reading documents Producing drafts and proofreading is definitely one thing I have in mind. > - summarizing a specific issue and making recommandations to the DPL / > advising the DPL on a specific area I am not sure I would be considering this aspect. I might consider this where sharing of confidential information is not required. > Do you plan to go further than that? A couple of other things I can think of are - Following up on To Dos with both DPL and other parties involved - As I mentioned in one of the previous replies on -vote, I intend to revisit all the existing delegated teams. DPL helpers could be help with the initial conversation with the teams > > If you plan to go further, don't you think that the needed > coordination/alignment inside the "DPL team" will cost more than the > gains? We wouldn't know until we try. > > Also, if you plan to delegate DPL powers, do you already know who will > be the 1-2 trusted persons that will work with you? (this is a problem > in our election mechanism -- we elect one DPL, and it's a bit strange if > there's a group of people hidden behind the curtains who we only learn > about after the election) If you don't, how do you plan to recruit them? I do not have anyone in my mind right now. As I do not intend to share any of the DPL powers, I do not think who becomes the DPL helpers team to help DPL with the basic administrative work should be a problem. This is still an idea and I am still not sure I will get anyone to volunteer for this. I just hope that there would be a couple of people to volunteer for this too as we get volunteers for all other teams in Debian. > > Lucas >
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 665 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsD5BAABCAAjFiEEcd3Fxr6GmkZB13n+x+ob4VdN7V0FAmnC4CYFAwAAAAAACgkQx+ob4VdN7V3b Pgv/bme9AbGuLFvF6PLp/OdrT6N+6ks3BWXmbZqVfXTXEJZV4dLG6O3F/c3cfOv2HqZh/iDcx9g5 1121BYxL0YLZMo8GikwCJddPMTvaLU9lndWIr6TdSn1Lron+MFeN14Dt17f4Kt/vPdIqps7p927U WbVY3HYiCRkG7rgb4aZBCdbjfblbWkWg8pLpHki8f0OcH59rmx41SSFAplljgaLDO4qOOF1QdIpC nUf8GA/tZnPZ4gNfps39AbtHJ9jzz2ncuJ1spxB3nilIKP4ZhuSzSzG4OyiY9RsRllTxAaqf6NuL WP2cIMRJX8+0EtOLNMqF/fDYLtXGlylEhQpk83ROuv3ADIk3uSXSyP60YdsJlJKwZBNmfSowgswF lvJ2IYuoQ2H/KljmH3g1LTaSthgWjJVoMRzR4CbrCE17NkfFCQ+uMTWCp1/760lu8COFhcb3O38C I/tdb0yBJtav2EHgSOAOm/GHpKswSOP+ROMkziBsWwYFSzqJmpNPZJwANEsw =w5qX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----