Re: Q: Delegations and their value

On 24/03/26 15:51, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Sruthi Chandran<[email protected]> [21/Mar  6:14pm +01] wrote:
>> We do have a good number of delegated teams and they all seem to work
>> well mostly. But I am sure there are gaps and there are possibilities
>> for more delegated teams.
> Many of our delegations are dysfunctional or barely functional.
> Some limp along for years and others are constantly on the brink of
> falling into dysfunction.
>
> If you try to do cross-project technical work that isn't just about the
> contents of packages, this situation rapidly becomes clear.  If/when you
> become DPL I think it will rapidly become clear to you as well.
>
> So while I agree with you that more teams should have delegations, this
> isn't the only problem and is perhaps not where the focus should be.
> Many existing delegations have significant issues.

I am aware of some dysfunctional teams. I assume outdated delegation 
could be one of the reasons. In addition to delegating new teams, I do 
intend to revisit each one of the delegated teams and refresh delegation 
if required. That is in my priority list.
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=1gOX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----