Re: Q: Debian as a registered organization

Sruthi Chandran <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 21/03/26 23:38, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Shruti,
>
> In these always darker ages, it looks like operating systems may have 
> to comply to laws we may not like. I have in mind the age verification 
> stuff, but not only, some more unexpected things may pop.
>
> If we become a Foundation, this automatically means registered USA, 
> no? In France, we'd call it an "association", and Foundation feels 
> like USA. Is this your plan?
Let me make it clear - "Debain Foundation" is just a term I borrowed 
from Brian Gupta's platform.
> If we become a registered entity, it'd be a way more easy for 
> governments to get us accounted for. Even more in the case of a 
> USA-registered Foundation. While with the current case, it'd be a way 
> harder for Debian to get into trouble. For example, the foundation 
> could be sued, and we'd have to pay for such trial in USA. But with 
> the current state, one would have to go after single individuals.
>
> How do you plan to deal with this?
>
> Also, could you expand on "exploring the possibilities" from your 
> platform? What does this mean?

I certainly *do not* have any plan to register Debian in USA, and 
anywhere for that matter next year.

When I said I would explore possibilities, I meant I will start a 
discussion surrounding the topic of "Debian as a registered entity". 
Registering Debian is not something that should be done in a hurry. More 
discussions should happen on the advantages and disadvantages of 
registering. While some disadvantages you mentioned, there are some 
advantages like when we are dealing with legal issues, having a 
registered entity helps.

>
> To be clear: I'm for keeping things as they are now for the reason 
> mentioned above.
Personally, I also want Debian to remain as is, if possible. But I want 
to study the issue in more depth, to see if it is still practical to 
remain as is.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 665 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=+kfO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.