Re: Q: Debian as a registered organization
Sruthi Chandran <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 21/03/26 23:38, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi Shruti, > > In these always darker ages, it looks like operating systems may have > to comply to laws we may not like. I have in mind the age verification > stuff, but not only, some more unexpected things may pop. > > If we become a Foundation, this automatically means registered USA, > no? In France, we'd call it an "association", and Foundation feels > like USA. Is this your plan? Let me make it clear - "Debain Foundation" is just a term I borrowed from Brian Gupta's platform. > If we become a registered entity, it'd be a way more easy for > governments to get us accounted for. Even more in the case of a > USA-registered Foundation. While with the current case, it'd be a way > harder for Debian to get into trouble. For example, the foundation > could be sued, and we'd have to pay for such trial in USA. But with > the current state, one would have to go after single individuals. > > How do you plan to deal with this? > > Also, could you expand on "exploring the possibilities" from your > platform? What does this mean? I certainly *do not* have any plan to register Debian in USA, and anywhere for that matter next year. When I said I would explore possibilities, I meant I will start a discussion surrounding the topic of "Debian as a registered entity". Registering Debian is not something that should be done in a hurry. More discussions should happen on the advantages and disadvantages of registering. While some disadvantages you mentioned, there are some advantages like when we are dealing with legal issues, having a registered entity helps. > > To be clear: I'm for keeping things as they are now for the reason > mentioned above. Personally, I also want Debian to remain as is, if possible. But I want to study the issue in more depth, to see if it is still practical to remain as is. > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) >
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 665 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsD5BAABCAAjFiEEcd3Fxr6GmkZB13n+x+ob4VdN7V0FAmnC2qsFAwAAAAAACgkQx+ob4VdN7V2s eQv/brUmHctrkkFwD2Aoex5jaZ6HBABbFAe0hnz9d4s8UUNWQAGyI8PSEGYuDhu8ytM5f0AZ7D9u kL1w71B05V8tolOysj+N6DPf7EQAW1CfO70H0hvClByx2muWZhvf4/f0nnyjqj+Xag+YhGpjxVBh PYXKSD8D1Ua1pyJrBTRcwRuER83qGSkEiP1DqKNup8HgR5RYOUWKwZfklAVk4gZWZCYI+J5UE/SQ pLRUxZ96UEGc8CbFFYUXEIpN8IHr+bRHBMLVRMmFrcAG5x1QemkP5hWVTYyek60QD3IXk+KMXGYb ULlP5RejNV4u3Y9Cm75VQqNm43wfYoXODBm4YyYRXUrSuTmpUPlUq7KAD7VrTd/0TXLqGQ2bIVsC WrWPUMcACZ18WjjH8uZ91ilml+suOuJ2UjzpnXrWJCxal2Dmo2UkWR7I7rdXdYRj/qSw6YQkiwyq /TerHrSs400bm3mJMiJzQ1BhdmWUGJdhsCByQWIwYPnVXmPPhOqgdqH5+dnA =+kfO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----