Re: Ballot option: Allow AI-Assisted Contributions
Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> Wed, 5 Aug 2026 17:32:06 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <anNJZnp6tliFjm9b@localhost> |
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 03:24:05PM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs wrote: > On Wed, 5 Aug 2026 at 15:09, Adrian Bunk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Regarding model output, a judge in New York wrote last year: > > > > Turning to the merits, the Court must determine whether the Consolidated > > Class > > Action Complaint adequately pleads an output-based infringement claim. > > It does.[2] > > > > This is not a decision on the merits, but it is an ongoing lawsuit where > > the judge did compare training data and model output in the decision not > > to dismiss. > > > Notable in the same opinion that the "fair use" was not yet cosnidered at > all, purely on procedural grounds - "A court cannot engage in the fair use > inquiry until it > has been presented with facts relevant to evaluating the fair use factors." In [1] I gave an example of a different judge calling this "the potentially winning argument", but "that these plaintiffs made the wrong argument". In [2] the plaintiffs are making the right argument, and it's not obvious on what basis the judge would dismiss without a trial. > The outputs presented in the case do not really differ much in > principle from Wikipedia or Goodreads summaries of the same books. That's not true: Similarly, a more discerning observer could properly conclude that outlines for potential sequels to plaintiffs’ works that were generated in response to prompts to ChatGPT are substantially similar to plaintiffs’ original works.[2] > Any > decision ruling that as derivative work requiring licenses would also kill > Wikipedia, Goodreads, IMDB and hundreds of other places on the Internet > that describe and books, tv shows or movies in any kind of detai. >... That's not true. The jury could for example decide that summaries do not have a negative impact on the market of the copyrighted work, but that generated sequels have a negative impact on the market for the upcoming "The Winds of Winter". cu Adrian > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2026/07/msg00157.html > > [2] https://assets.law360news.com/2404000/2404371/https-ecf-nysd-uscourts-gov-doc1-127138452540.pdf