Re: Request to extend - General resolution: LLM usage in Debian
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Sruthi, On 06/08/26 at 08:59 -0300, Sruthi Chandran wrote: > Dear Project Secretary and Debian Developers, > > I would like to exercise my rights as DPL (§A.1.6 in the Debian > Constitution) and extend the discussion period of this GR by 7 days. > > I believe this is a very important GR, which could benefit with some more > time for the discussion. I must say I'm a bit surprised: which additional topics should be explored in your opinion, or which topics should be explored more in depth? I was actually thinking that the discussion had been useful, covered everything that needed to be explored, and that the discussion was rightfully dying out as the discussion period was also coming to an end. Lucas
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE/t7ByzN7z1CfQ8IkORS1MvTfvpkFAmp0nkUACgkQORS1MvTf vpnqQA//amffT23w1j9cp0lODlc8gaB2bGXdqHVDLO04fIvOBejTCpD9AExXU2es aB00z3QTyBY4xW9gLKYXEIC7GTzwrZZDpJnaf4BkW2AXUKjG/3SvmgAAR5DyNy00 g1pqlTjzc4keJWt83hx9Eg507Xq4VGHkhqJGd+ebdBzdmV4H4t2vINE3DlK4AifU EUu0X19FN+Ce4MCQd4u2GJR+fEwpYvOYr/X5gKbVrF/KZCZ/jFV/mxuwJo4sM+Up ScO4rsVEm6/d0fqkcc1fu0Dz0kKqbMrG6q9Vu8pGEHluD6+XZgDBGa42qbHo/mfz ISmBcFLlTUNcoR+MutKL+mxJiKG0h/BgRDpNCJk9FKgwFnGacuYMYYIIW59CJimg ceXOi5RMxYqNiTA9VK8lWdSuLQ0xy3BA2wyDGnHZjm3Gcpf3/CpVrhC4dm87BzTh s+sKtn8mtBjYCvfW+2jOYUHeQvzpkcOlwZhJFn1vaH9weswud9358LSK+K708jGG OdrZrYWCIS028ZH1EjCaensXCvoOdmqLMl2A59hEzVN4NGWF1pj0d2abQ902xxWv IUBwvVeHjs5RzLOMGcex3h6BDe5VwwW3JV3vGSkWIDFXBdOykZuCtSJXnAJI9h9/ bOpjFoq64DMF8OWFgDk1o2xZdekQcHA1E8ax+sXPw48ezDSbFL4= =tzGT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----