Re: BALLOT OPTION: A cautious approach to generative AI
Jonathan Carter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.vote |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Tobi On 2026/07/29 12:22, Tobias Frost wrote: > -----BEGIN DRAFT PROPOSAL----- > > Summary: A cautious approach to generative AI > > Using its power under Constitution section 4.1(5), the Project issues > the following statement describing its current position regarding the > use of generative AI within Debian. > > Debian recognizes that generative AI raises significant ethical, legal, > technical, and social concerns. These include questions relating to > copyright and licensing, privacy, the provenance and quality of > generated material, the health of Free Software communities, and the > long-term consequences of widespread reliance on AI-generated content. > > Accordingly, Debian encourages contributors to avoid the use of > generative AI where practical and to prefer human authorship, > collaboration, and technical understanding over AI-generated output. > > At the same time, Debian has long relied on the judgment and > responsibility of its contributors rather than prescribing individual > workflows. Contributors remain responsible for everything they submit, > irrespective of the tools used in preparing a contribution. Existing > Debian standards regarding quality, correctness, licensing, and legal > compliance continue to apply. > > Contributors using external generative AI services should exercise > particular care not to disclose confidential information, embargoed > security information, credentials, cryptographic keys, private > communications, personal data, or other non-public Debian information. > > Nothing in this resolution should be understood as requiring > contributors to use generative AI, nor as preventing contributors or > maintainers from choosing not to use or accept AI-assisted > contributions. Debian's existing collaborative processes remain the > appropriate means for resolving such differences while allowing the > project to continue making progress. > > While disclosure is not required, contributors are encouraged to > voluntarily disclose the use of generative AI where appropriate, > allowing others who prefer not to interact with AI-assisted content to > make informed choices. > > Such disclosure should be regarded as a courtesy to fellow contributors > rather than an indication that AI-assisted contributions are subject to > different technical or procedural standards. > > The Debian project has always recognized the commitment and > professionalism of its members. All contributions are under the > responsibility of the Debian Contributor making it, no matter the > technology they have behind. We trust all Debian Developers, > Maintainers and Contributors will continue to uphold the high quality > values that have distinguished our project from its onset. > > -----END PROPOSAL----- For the avoidance of doubt, I second this version. (Sorry for the delay, fell behind on this list, which can be hazardous!) -Jonathan
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEExyA8CpIGcL+U8AuxsB0acqyNyaEFAmp1ClgACgkQsB0acqyN yaHAERAApHyXw4QAVhtDwSjNXXy5ShKNZwCIlyoA/Ih9V6NLu6J3W08VEwGv3rR0 D5l0S0Rgf8hHceta16XZTKRYHoioIIlb+ejnNqtourgjWYTYFCih6APUU3cNQ4vg Cu6VFfq+O6AYdvULeuzUyAbHFPO0bB6rKHiQN8kFu24RByW71P+qJ5nOHsB2erwQ s8X603s6pzHd3Xt26IUps87TumTsyD+xPkUbErBoJU65g+HzMigrBU4ix7zcftzZ XpqN+KaXns0eTxOJYGhTr1nKWEHivNjEwwvfRpiwuftTiW1FLwSg14/mxAXcPBj3 YCDYm3nmhrbQM6tJogTheR8z2iHAnC1dJUHHOWb9MZt9RKvINSm9SUlvsC5JvzTR JWD/q5Ogyc4GeXrCtRRbYputp17aKGAreKM+0cNQZRCVtpVUVVXmjuyq93XJNxMh 2O01pKrNuXBixX0/gaMzwuAQzBx5kG1kxZoS748E7xObVXQ6NDL+4ocyHbKhB6Qb j3pU6vtBaday3suLDKTb3/1cmb1ue9Dpp1dq+BljXIYcXgDUYuchwh+c15+6U9sq 3mEjAdjb2VTxYiGpGRNn5DxPXtCwx9zkQ9AGWc2RIqw6pZp2EfBOz34G9Y6eE8Gw PWpjkzxysVbGnrNw0SSvptAK6epbiw9AWObB1sIuWo540PvJ1Eo= =9SB1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----