Re: LLM usage in Debian -- ballot options comparison

Hi,

On 8/15/26 15:09, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> I am well aware that this is controversial. I received both very
> positive and very negative feedback, and also requests to update the
> table.

It is, most of all, pointless.

Voters are still required to read all the proposals, just as people 
using LLMs for programming are still required to read and understand all 
of the code they submit.

So reading this summary is *additional* work. We don't even know if it 
accurately reflects the state of the discussion, because we'd need to 
invest even more *additional* work into verifying that, let alone 
bringing it into an acceptable shape if it isn't.

    Simon

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEtjuqOJSXmNjSiX3Tfr04e7CZCBEFAmqAHrgACgkQfr04e7CZ
CBHbEwf/T+Snkfi9YGQNacoyL+cihtEWBw6YOFyIYTvQLTCS2AW4vWEtSBp8ON8D
mLTy4Lpdd0NMX03l1lnzZQkrMEk+Km2qx8maoadnqFrI+1pKDkPqoiAJGJzVYbPR
zx8LLVWrWmoZ2y1dg+4hxu5hxG4GLy0syURd88bQdEAo+g1OE0rQGGIPiiMRY0YD
yFC/yfhtOFAHRVj1UJ9bOITc3KMT5jESP8LL122FGY1oEK8CcZqBpE4r9wulv4JS
m/dYyoCWBUiokai5X5ofzQyCOSB4vghn9M75qU4bp13NGP52A3pNUI+0AUCTNbxo
KwX94E2kbr7/Jdtc3BzMhRmWygA9gg==
=bE3i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----