Re: LLM usage in Debian -- ballot options comparison

On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 05:09:28PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
>On 8/15/26 15:09, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>I am well aware that this is controversial. I received both very
>>positive and very negative feedback, and also requests to update the
>>table.
>
>It is, most of all, pointless.
>
>Voters are still required to read all the proposals, just as people 
>using LLMs for programming are still required to read and understand 
>all of the code they submit.

Please speak for yourself. This is a classical case of AI contribution 
being useful. It allows me to first make myself a rough picture of 
things and determining the order in which I will re-read the proposals.

This is a major help for me. In my Opinion. And I thank Lucas for doing 
this work.

Greetings
Marc