Re: loong64 was not included in https://packages.debian.org/ page
Holger Wansing <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.www |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 23. Februar 2025 16:51:26 MEZ schrieb Holger Wansing <[email protected]>: >Hi, > >zhangdandan <[email protected]> wrote (Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:23:06 +0800): >> Hi, >> >> I checked that loong64 was not included in https://packages.debian.org/ >> page. >> For examples, >> - dpkg >> dpkg was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building >> environment, please view >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dpkg&suite=sid. >> But loong64 was not included in the end of the page >> https://packages.debian.org/sid/dpkg. >> >> - apt and more packages in sid (unstable) >> apt was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building >> environment, please view >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apt&suite=sid. >> But loong64 was not included in the end of the page >> https://packages.debian.org/sid/apt. >> >> Please help to add loong64 in https://packages.debian.org/ page. > >I have created a merge request for this: >https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/36 Sorry, I was not aware of MR35, created for the same issue. So I closed my MR. Holger -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3