Re: loong64 was not included in https://packages.debian.org/ page

Hi,

I am glad to receive your reply.
Thanks for your help and submission.

鍦 2025/2/23 涓嬪崍11:51, Holger Wansing 鍐欓亾:
> Hi,
>
> zhangdandan <[email protected]> wrote (Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:23:06 +0800):
>> Hi,
>>
>> I checked that loong64 was not included in https://packages.debian.org/
>> page.
>> For examples,
>> - dpkg
>> dpkg was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building
>> environment, please view
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dpkg&suite=sid.
>> But loong64 was not included in the end of the page
>> https://packages.debian.org/sid/dpkg.
>>
>> - apt and more packages in sid (unstable)
>> apt was built for loong64 in the Debian Package Auto-Building
>> environment, please view
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apt&suite=sid.
>> But loong64 was not included in the end of the page
>> https://packages.debian.org/sid/apt.
>>
>> Please help to add loong64 in https://packages.debian.org/ page.
> I have created a merge request for this:
> https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/packages/-/merge_requests/36

Could maintainer help to review and merge the MR of loong64 support?

Best regards,
Dandan