Re: Wiki: Remove some outdated pages?

On Mon Mar 24, 2025 at 1:51 PM CET, Thomas Lange wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:39:10 +0000, Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> said:
>
>     > Why remove documentation on what has been considered and done in the
>     > web team? What harm are those pages causing?
> To improve the ratio between good and outdated content.

the meta-problem here is: we have no (rough) consensus on what the wiki is *for*

is it for internal team docs? then keeping KallesDesign could indeed be useful
as a reference to future contributors. is it for end-user documentation that is
meant to be kept up to date? then KallesDesign is not.

the current (sorry, imho) state of the wiki suggests that the answer is: for
pretty much *anything* remotely Debian related, including for archiving
information of purely historical interest, and we would rather have low quality
information (where freshness is one aspect of quality) than no information at
all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KmWJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----