Re: Build xorg* and rootskel-gtk packages on s390x buildds
Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Jul 2026 10:18:26 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.devel.wb-team,gmane.linux.debian.devel.x,gmane.linux.debian.devel.boot |
|---|---|
| Organization | Debian |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--7yv5ketixkjr6eyb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Jochen Sprickerhof <[email protected]> (2026-07-15): > # xorg stuff > %xf86-input-multitouch: !s390x > %xf86-input-wacom: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-input-aiptek: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-input-elographics: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-input-joystick: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-input-mouse: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-input-mutouch: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-ati: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-cirrus: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-fbdev: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-mach64: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-mga: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-neomagic: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-r128: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-savage: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion: !s390x > %xserver-xorg-video-sisusb: !s390x > # graphical > %rootskel-gtk: !s390x >=20 > https://salsa.debian.org/wb-team/packages-arch-specific/-/blob/sid/Packag= es-arch-specific >=20 > I am mailing you as you are listed as the maintainer of some of these > packages. We would like to drop the complete Packages-arch-specific file. >=20 > To keep a package from being built on s390x, one option would be adding > something like this to d/control: >=20 > Build-Depends: do-not-build-on-s390x [s390x] >=20 > Another option would be to just build the packages on s390x too. As far as rootskel-gtk is concerned, letting it build on s390x shouldn't change much. Ditto for the few xserver-xorg-* that produce udebs (which should be input-libinput and video-fbdev). If those end up being problematic on the debian-cd side, we have an exclude mechanism that can be used to drop any extraneous udebs. I don't remember the exact details, but s390x is special-cased already, with fewer images being built anyway. TL;DR: Dropping P-a-s without adjusting those packages shouldn't be an issue from a d-i point of view. Cheers, --=20 Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant --7yv5ketixkjr6eyb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEtg6/KYRFPHDXTPR4/5FK8MKzVSAFAmpXQkoACgkQ/5FK8MKz VSATLw/+KPv1z0iuNFhSZfJE7cfmC9Ncd2iXRiEjEX90s4lgAzBQJT7kGsd6NKEB knGCz5RCDGGZEIl7d30Hf12AjzsoQ8UHJbB9vGq49h8dnwoVBI1/1lIdfNZ+ebxZ CWnPeIT+4khJXh5uBOfclH9MgXg3+diJLovLusT16cSsB/vt+4QNWAt8JYA+7XqY iMeeK4JviWM0AQMJqli7nNQJ33YZImXfg4g3cixx7umh/+53zqZWDY3Maeg2g8ZB NDT1lH0Ofq0p3qzFvjRi8hTfsvOmaoxfv+e4FEAt1024OiHIyVcy09BcJiE63hGY 3M5DNc/03E3j30z/r5fUnVWine0dcgE4xtTaMeeGRv7FzGQBrmFT05kk1BQBjYP2 7nkSLgHSP7p+VsJNWHdKFcGYX3QJaMYoTrEiQiTDORn5d9jHFDFlIElCm0XBBcLW 124/p1ZbqgeawkKxtDb6HhQ7CMy5wi+euM5zq4BSOaNO0A5+TDlUBIO6wn2di5XN P2RpV7gfOPnaSA+bigaD7bcL2ViywfS7I3qosZigC7uTjUKxjhclxYOH8UXp2mCQ Th6/kOxLJnmv+QOu/8J8PXHPyjpPmzhlgiapxy0ImrBcXhLW8buY5KDGlD3tki+l gEoqpTehGAWyOMcw3mS+ZUkroCaOPwT8MTPweeajhpg3PYLCA3s= =m4Se -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7yv5ketixkjr6eyb--