Re: muesli's repository strategy + packages are getting updated
Heine Salte <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:19:52 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.debian.kde.cvs |
|---|---|
| Organization | DragonStar Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:31, bil Jeschke wrote: > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 05:29 am, Martin Atukunda wrote: > ---snip--- > > > But i would think that KDE_STABLE stable be dropped when the other > > branches are opened and functional. > > > > my 2c > > > > - Martin - > > There is one good reason to keep a stable repository, besides a fall back > for when the dev branch gets too unstable. It is compiled for 686. > It would be interesting to benchmark kde 3.2 for 386 v. 686 to see the > difference if any. Perhaps we could start a movement towards a 686 branch > of Debian, and then Global Domination! HAHAHAHA!!! > *drool* that would be nice...686 packages for debian unstable i mean ;) > Time for more coffee. > > bil > > _______________________________________________ > debian-kde-cvs mailing list > [email protected] > http://opendoorsoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/debian-kde-cvs - -- ================================ Heine Salte [email protected] ================================ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAIQ2Yucdk4hBvNDYRAp/5AKCyeOCe+nUDUyGi7cgYkwgeTeqKEQCffUBs Y1o0Z1+d3ESdfUerj348kLc= =Op7c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----