Re: muesli's repository strategy + packages are getting updated

Heine Salte <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:19:52 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.kde.cvs
Organization DragonStar Inc.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 04 February 2004 15:31, bil Jeschke wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 February 2004 05:29 am, Martin Atukunda wrote:
> ---snip---
>
> > But i would think that KDE_STABLE stable be dropped when the other
> > branches are opened and functional.
> >
> > my 2c
> >
> > - Martin -
>
> There is one good reason to keep a stable repository, besides a fall back
> for when the dev branch gets too unstable.  It is compiled for 686.
> It would be interesting to benchmark kde 3.2 for 386 v. 686 to see the
> difference if any. Perhaps we could start a movement towards a 686 branch
> of Debian, and then Global Domination! HAHAHAHA!!!
>
*drool* that would be nice...686 packages for debian unstable i mean ;) 

> Time for more coffee.
>
> bil
>
> _______________________________________________
> debian-kde-cvs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://opendoorsoftware.com/mailman/listinfo/debian-kde-cvs

- -- 
================================
Heine Salte
[email protected]
================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAIQ2Yucdk4hBvNDYRAp/5AKCyeOCe+nUDUyGi7cgYkwgeTeqKEQCffUBs
Y1o0Z1+d3ESdfUerj348kLc=
=Op7c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----