Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k,gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.user
Message-ID <1ceb208498c53cf8db2acf746a4649f1eaea1457.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 07:59 +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2025, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> 
> > 
> > My argument is that Linux/m68k is a pure hobbyist project and anyone 
> > involved can deal with the changes coming from the alignment change.
> > 
> 
> If hobbyists can deal with ABI breakage, they can certainly deal with the 
> longstanding lack of fancy toolchains and toolkits*.

Being able to build the build dependencies of cmake or parts of GCC such
as gccgo is not something I would consider "fancy". Furthermore, more and
more packages are being ported to Rust which means m68k will either die
a long death or have to switch to 4 bytes alignment.

> But you're being presumtuous. Your hobby may be the porting of fancy 
> toolchains. It's not mine!

I am not asking you as you're not involved in maintaining Debian/m68k.

> There's no such thing as a "pure hobbyist" Linux port. This is a 
> collaborative effort. Debian/m68k needs corporations just as RHEL needs 
> volunteers.

Can you point me to anyone else who is involved in Debian/m68k except me?

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer
`. `'   Physicist
  `-    GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.