Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int

Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.user
Message-ID <CAMuHMdWMJKbd-Nfe6yWc_XE56KFmffnJ3T9AhNgUZ4=m9UGSeA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Adrian,

On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 09:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 07:59 +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 May 2025, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > My argument is that Linux/m68k is a pure hobbyist project and anyone
> > > involved can deal with the changes coming from the alignment change.
> >
> > If hobbyists can deal with ABI breakage, they can certainly deal with the
> > longstanding lack of fancy toolchains and toolkits*.
>
> Being able to build the build dependencies of cmake or parts of GCC such
> as gccgo is not something I would consider "fancy". Furthermore, more and
> more packages are being ported to Rust which means m68k will either die
> a long death or have to switch to 4 bytes alignment.

Is this a Rust or LLVM issue?
In case of the latter, how is llvm-mos coping?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.