Re: Tuple and changes for m68k with -malign-int
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.m68k,gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k,gmane.comp.lib.glibc.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMuHMdWMJKbd-Nfe6yWc_XE56KFmffnJ3T9AhNgUZ4=m9UGSeA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Adrian, On Tue, 20 May 2025 at 09:56, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 07:59 +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > > On Mon, 19 May 2025, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > My argument is that Linux/m68k is a pure hobbyist project and anyone > > > involved can deal with the changes coming from the alignment change. > > > > If hobbyists can deal with ABI breakage, they can certainly deal with the > > longstanding lack of fancy toolchains and toolkits*. > > Being able to build the build dependencies of cmake or parts of GCC such > as gccgo is not something I would consider "fancy". Furthermore, more and > more packages are being ported to Rust which means m68k will either die > a long death or have to switch to 4 bytes alignment. Is this a Rust or LLVM issue? In case of the latter, how is llvm-mos coping? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected] In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds