Re: preparing for GCC 4.9

Hiroyuki Yamamoto <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Matthias Klose wrote:
> With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the change of
> the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
> architectures.  The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends already
> point to 4.9 and are used on all architectures.  Issue #746805 tracks the
> gfortran default change, including the change of the Fortran 90 module version
> change.
> 
> The Debian archive was rebuilt twice on amd64, once in February, resulting in
> bug submissions for GCC and feedback for the porting guide [1], a second time in
> March to file issues for packages failing to build with GCC 4.9 [2].  Another
> test rebuild for Ubuntu on amd64, i386, armhf, ppc64el didn't show any other
> compiler regressions on these architectures.
> 
> I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot
> packages) for other architectures. Any possibility to setup such a test rebuild
> for some architectures by the porters? Afaics the results for the GCC testsuite
> look okish for every architecture.
> 
> I'll work on fixing the build failures in [2], help is of course appreciated.
> Almost all build failures are analyzed and should be easy to fix (exceptions
> e.g. #746883).  Patches for the ones not caused by the Debian packaging may be
> found in distributions already using GCC 4.9 as the default compiler (e.g.
> Fedora 21).
> 
> If anything goes well, and a large amount of build failures are fixed, I plan to
> make GCC 4.9 the default for the C/C++/ObjC/Obj-C++ frontends at the end of May,
> beginning of June.
> 
> Bugs reports for packages building with a legacy version of GCC (4.6, 4.7, 4.8)
> will be filed.
> 
>   Matthias
> 
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html
> [2]
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.9;[email protected]


OK.
I will cooperate in ppc64 port as possible as i do, 
at least,  tests of rebuilding  the packages of buildd with gcc-4.9.

Regards,
- -- 
Hiroyuki Yamamoto
A75D B285 7050 4BF9 AEDA  91AC 3A10 59C6 5203 04DC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=n4y4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.