Re: preparing for GCC 4.9

Patrick Baggett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.amd64
Message-ID <CAEk2Stn3q4Xq+ES4m+p3pbmCcpL=JEih605dkJcOZ3LUXj7=Kw__17779.4219031513$1399925011$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Matthias et al,

I'd like to try to do some of this using my sparc box and see how far I
get. Is there a link that explains how to set up these steps? Others seem
to "just know" what to do, but I haven't the slightest idea of where to
begin. I have a box with gcc-4.9, plenty of disk space, and electricity to
burn. Where do I start?

Patrick


On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Matthias Klose <[email protected]> wrote:

> With gcc-4.9 now available in testing, it is time to prepare for the
> change of
> the default to 4.9, for a subset of architectures or for all (release)
> architectures.  The defaults for the gdc, gccgo, gcj and gnat frontends
> already
> point to 4.9 and are used on all architectures.  Issue #746805 tracks the
> gfortran default change, including the change of the Fortran 90 module
> version
> change.
>
> The Debian archive was rebuilt twice on amd64, once in February, resulting
> in
> bug submissions for GCC and feedback for the porting guide [1], a second
> time in
> March to file issues for packages failing to build with GCC 4.9 [2].
>  Another
> test rebuild for Ubuntu on amd64, i386, armhf, ppc64el didn't show any
> other
> compiler regressions on these architectures.
>
> I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal
> chroot
> packages) for other architectures. Any possibility to setup such a test
> rebuild
> for some architectures by the porters? Afaics the results for the GCC
> testsuite
> look okish for every architecture.
>
> I'll work on fixing the build failures in [2], help is of course
> appreciated.
> Almost all build failures are analyzed and should be easy to fix
> (exceptions
> e.g. #746883).  Patches for the ones not caused by the Debian packaging
> may be
> found in distributions already using GCC 4.9 as the default compiler (e.g.
> Fedora 21).
>
> If anything goes well, and a large amount of build failures are fixed, I
> plan to
> make GCC 4.9 the default for the C/C++/ObjC/Obj-C++ frontends at the end
> of May,
> beginning of June.
>
> Bugs reports for packages building with a legacy version of GCC (4.6, 4.7,
> 4.8)
> will be filed.
>
>   Matthias
>
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/porting_to.html
> [2]
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-gcc-4.9;[email protected]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [email protected]
> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.