Re: Qt 6 on X32 and HPPA ports: upstream requiring proof of usage

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <[email protected]> Thu, 02 Feb 2023 16:01:21 -0300

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.kde.talk,gmane.linux.debian.ports.hppa
Message-ID	<2139133.irdbgypaU6@gryffindor>

El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 15:54:44 -03 Helge Deller escribió:
> On 2/2/23 19:21, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 15:08:49 -03 Sam James escribió:
> > [snip]
> > 
> >>> Pruning whatever code they do not test on the CI and does not has active
> >>> users, no matter how short/long it can be.
> >> 
> >> At
> >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qbs/qbs/+/437296/comments/9b34cbab_87
> >> ce
> >> d2e4, someone suggested adding cross HPPA (and maybe others) to their
> >> Docker setup. That could be a start.
> > 
> > I'm quite in contact with the CI staff. I sincerely don't think they will
> > want to add yet another CI image except they have a big client requiring
> > it :-/
> I think this will only be debian, and gentoo - both distributions support
> hppa.
> > I'll bring it up next week, but I will not have high expectations on this.
> 
> Btw, I did noticed that the hppa build on debian failed, but was too busy
> with other things to look into it. And, I was hoping someone would fix it
> as it seemed trivial.
> Beside the CI, we have two debian porterboxes for hppa, so testing is
> possible.

Well, that's already a bad signal :-/ It means there are no real users for it 
(yet?), else you would be seeing complaints :-(

-- 
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)