Re: Qt 6 on X32 and HPPA ports: upstream requiring proof of usage

On 2/2/23 20:01, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 15:54:44 -03 Helge Deller escribió:
>> On 2/2/23 19:21, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>>> El jueves, 2 de febrero de 2023 15:08:49 -03 Sam James escribió:
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>>> Pruning whatever code they do not test on the CI and does not has active
>>>>> users, no matter how short/long it can be.
>>>>
>>>> At
>>>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qbs/qbs/+/437296/comments/9b34cbab_87
>>>> ce
>>>> d2e4, someone suggested adding cross HPPA (and maybe others) to their
>>>> Docker setup. That could be a start.
>>>
>>> I'm quite in contact with the CI staff. I sincerely don't think they will
>>> want to add yet another CI image except they have a big client requiring
>>> it :-/
>> I think this will only be debian, and gentoo - both distributions support
>> hppa.
>>> I'll bring it up next week, but I will not have high expectations on this.
>>
>> Btw, I did noticed that the hppa build on debian failed, but was too busy
>> with other things to look into it. And, I was hoping someone would fix it
>> as it seemed trivial.
>> Beside the CI, we have two debian porterboxes for hppa, so testing is
>> possible.
>
> Well, that's already a bad signal :-/ It means there are no real users for it
> (yet?), else you would be seeing complaints :-(

why should one complain if the package is available although some of the builds fail?:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=qt6-base&arch=hppa
I'd like to get it to build always...
I mentioned the porterboxes to ease build-testing for debian developers.

Helge

-- 
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk