Re: Bug#1120984: sbuild: uninstallable on hurd-any

Jochen Sprickerhof <[email protected]> Wed, 19 Nov 2025 13:15:56 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.ports.hurd
Organization	The Debian Project
Message-ID	<aR20_CbWfKkgxKYP@vis>

Hi Luke,

* Luke Yasuda <[email protected]> [2025-11-19 20:40]:
>>meaningless. Using "iproute | hurd" would be better, no?
>>
>>What do you think?
>
>I think reverting that commit should be the best solution. Making 
>sbuild arch:any looks very ugly to me...and I don't think it makes 
>sense for iproute2 to stay in Depends, because sbuild can still use 
>schroot, and unlike unshare, schroot works everywhere.

Would there be any problem with iproute2 | hurd as josch suggested?
I would prefer that over reverting.

Cheers Jochen

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 833 B)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=X2xE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.