Re: Bug#1120984: sbuild: uninstallable on hurd-any

Samuel Thibault <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.ports.hurd
Organization I am not organized
Message-ID <aR22QJ3yyKav2siw@end>
Jochen Sprickerhof, le mer. 19 nov. 2025 13:15:56 +0100, a ecrit:
> * Luke Yasuda <[email protected]> [2025-11-19 20:40]:
> > > meaningless. Using "iproute | hurd" would be better, no?
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > 
> > I think reverting that commit should be the best solution. Making sbuild
> > arch:any looks very ugly to me...and I don't think it makes sense for
> > iproute2 to stay in Depends, because sbuild can still use schroot, and
> > unlike unshare, schroot works everywhere.
> 
> Would there be any problem with iproute2 | hurd as josch suggested?
> I would prefer that over reverting.

I don't really see a problem, we already do this on some arch:all
packages.

Samuel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.