Re: linux_4.6-1~exp2_multi.changes REJECTED

Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> Mon, 30 May 2016 19:13:59 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel,gmane.linux.debian.ports.mips
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 16:26 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> 
> Processing raised an exception: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or wildcard.
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 968, in check
>     final_suites = self._final_suites()
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 857, in _final_suites
>     if self._check_new(suite, overridesuite):
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 822, in _check_new
>     if self._check_new_binary_overrides(suite, overridesuite):
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/archive.py", line 786, in _check_new_binary_overrides
>     packages = source.package_list.packages_for_suite(suite)
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 128, in packages_for_suite
>     built = entry.built_in_suite(suite)
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 58, in built_in_suite
>     built_on_arch = self.built_on_architecture(arch.arch_string)
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/packagelist.py", line 49, in built_on_architecture
>     if match_architecture(architecture, arch):
>   File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/daklib/architecture.py", line 94, in match_architecture
>     raise InvalidArchitecture('{0} is not a valid architecture name or wildcard'.format(wildcard))
> InvalidArchitecture: mipsr6 is not a valid architecture name or wildcard

OK, what's the story here?  This had better get fixed quickly,
otherwise I'm going to have to revert the package changes.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)